Consensus and Controversy in Urinary Drainage Systems: Implications for Improving Patient Safety
نویسنده
چکیده
such systems to reduce UTI risk. D espite remarkable progress in the devices and technology that support healthcare practices, little has changed about the design of the indwelling urinary catheter since it was introduced in the 1930s. However, ongoing changes in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services prospective payment system for inpatient services has focused considerable attention on potentially preventable nosocomial events, including catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs). This increased scrutiny has prompted clinicians to question not only indications and techniques for indwelling urinary catheterization but also the materials, size, and other features of the optimal catheter. This scrutiny has further led clinicians to reexamine the design of the urinary drainage system, including its ability to safely and promptly drain urine from the bladder into a reservoir, its ability to prevent backflow of urine from the drainage system into the bladder, and its influence on the risk of catheter-associated UTI. In order to gain a Symposium: Consensus and controversy in urinary drainage systems: Implications for improving patient safety
منابع مشابه
It Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’
متن کاملThe Zeitgeist of Challenging the Evidence. A Perspective on the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection
Background: The economic burden of the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is high and the treatment of PJI has a high degree of international controversy. Several papers have declared the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection (ICMPJI) to be the "flawless pledge of international academics" to overcome the challenges of musculoskeletal infections. The p...
متن کاملThe Many Meanings of Evidence: Implications for the Translational Science Agenda in Healthcare
Health systems across the world are concerned with the quality and safety of patient care. This includes investing in research and development to progress advances in the treatment and management of individuals and healthcare organisations. The concept of evidence- based healthcare has gained increasing currency over the last two decades; yet questions persist about the time it takes for new re...
متن کاملGood practice statements on safe laboratory testing: A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care
BACKGROUND The systems-based management of laboratory test ordering and results handling is a known source of error in primary care settings worldwide. The consequences are wide-ranging for patients (e.g. avoidable harm or poor care experience), general practitioners (e.g. delayed clinical decision making and potential medico-legal implications) and the primary care organization (e.g. increased...
متن کاملDisturbing the Doxa of Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
In a recent edition of this journal, Mannion and Braithwaite provide a succinct analysis of the emergence, and ultimately limited impact, of what they term the current ‘Safety I’ movement in healthcare. They describe the arc of this field from denial, through engagement via mechanisms and approaches imported from other industries, to the current situation where, despite ‘best efforts,’ error ra...
متن کامل